Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deathwatch"

From Archiveteam
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:Deathwatch on Wheels! moved to Talk:Deathwatch over redirect: Unwheeling)
(bebo: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
--[[User:Ross|Ross]] 13:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Ross|Ross]] 13:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== bebo ==
 +
 +
I hear that AOL is dropping bebo, either by selling or closing. [http://www.clickz.com/3640014][http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2010/04/aol-says-bye-bye-bebo.html]--[[User:Tikatu|Tikatu]] 15:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:46, 8 April 2010

LiveJournal is choking more of tinfoil wraparounds than realities now, [AFAIK,] hedging there in the 'crisis' department, as it currently does. - Would a 'Got Better' subparagraph work for it, (..with some bylines not to take all eyes of it, still,) or is something looming that I can't see, here? - User:Name - Later: I've taken some whimsical liberties on this one, ymmv.

hit points

i like it. maybe we could have some sort of Hit Point system for sites, as they're taking damage. haha.

--Ross 13:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

bebo

I hear that AOL is dropping bebo, either by selling or closing. [1][2]--Tikatu 15:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)